Wednesday, May 4, 2011

Where Can I Buy Maternity Pads At

SHADOW OF OUR DESIRE - Darko Tuševljaković (part 2)

in
first part of this text link

I cited a few dozen quotations from this novel, which I have illustrated books related problems, mainly, to form, but through them, of course, crawling and much deeper problems of poetics of this writer, who not only confine on his abilities to more or less skillfully sroči 'written' sentence.
particular, I noted the following problems tuševljakovićevog style:
1) pathetic tendency to pathos, 2) bombastic metaphors, exaggerated comparisons and hypertrophied personification, 3) incongruently, inadequate, atmosphere-breaking figures of speech and phrases, and 4) bezveznjačke 'environmental wisdom' and ridiculous widened moral teaching. inconceivable to me that someone who has possibly built Reader can taste shrugged in ONE sentence, quoted from the book earlier in the text, and to tell him they do not bother, they are okay, it's not that bad, gee, What's wrong, insufficient compliance. However, I will not repeat myself - to anyone with eyes, brains and taste these tuševljakovićeve sentence saying enough.
however, only one remark on this occasion: the forum which brings together those fantasy fans who patron-Boban so far not driven, as well as a scandal amateurs and beginners in writing, to sound the writer, radmilo anđelković (Online: 'Scallop'). He said there :
"Darko is the most talented and most literate among local young writers of fiction, you can hate. "
why this court is awesome?
because he signed there some kind of ' skalop
'? not.
because it hides behind the author of several published novels and collections of stories (unknown outside the genre ghetto - but never mind ...)? pasha, not even that. awesome because it was signed by the man who was once a long time ago, and then after a certain pause, in the last few years, assumed the lead author whose Workshop at the club, Current events, now the home of youth.
assess the man works new, young talents, writers-beginners who want to be reflected in fiction (or, horror proven a hater, and his express nepoznavalac). this is a man who will assess whether you have literary talent or not. He will advise you. He will teach you. it will boast that you
- if you bring him a sentence like:
"in her lap, on the surface of the lake of tears, floating a few small wild flowers."
"At the table was silence, such that a fork on porcelain rang out like the organ in a small kitchen cathedral."
"In the distance, a lone thunder sounded as a homeless person who coughs last night brandy."
"Clouds was threatening the country, such as dental caries over the full otežalog language."
"I followed him like a dog, dragging his feet on the ground and muffled growling."
so insufficient compliance kids, if you want to aminuje and consecrate skalop uncle, has to write sentences SUCH.
and not just skalop. have you aminuje and the rest of the ghettos of dubious taste and even sumnjivijih criteria. When you see that 'criticism' comes from one of the circle of active rivjuera Current events (John Milaković Milos Cvetkovic, Djordje Bajic) - there is no uncertainty with them. the principle of 'born to be, it should be swung,' you will 'critics' to find something positive, no matter how it sounded tensely, and najmediokritetskijem product, and all the misguided principle that books should not criticize the ghetto, but they boast maximum wherever may be, of the potential disadvantages of their whisper with the author in 4 eye - or even that, but him / her behind his back. Therefore, those who survive the story from skalopove 'master' workshops, there is no worry: there will always be "friendly" by the word "friend" who will you tolerate nonsense and you write panegyrics on all sorts popboks and eating kebovima.
who loves you, let you go.
according anđelkovićevoj apodiktičnoj (though nowhere reasoned) argument, I must be one of those that "hate" dark; moreover, probably envy him, and who knows what.
However, in the hope that at least someone understands why I do what no one else will (and, let's be honest, and
can ) I continue with the criticism, because it's my cross !
therefore, to see how little darko handled by genre, as it is a twist on what it is and what is the point of all those "nice" sentences in the "most talented" writer.
for convenience and clarity, and these are divided into several groups.

1) dramaturgical discrepancies and inconsistencies
a) cultural gypsy - fortune-teller who can not see a finger in his face.
in this novel we have a Gypsy woman-witch doctor who speaks pure literary language. OK, maybe it is somewhere. There must be a cultural one. but then what its acidic sweat smells to heaven? which fall upon the people of the promenade as a ragged homeless babaroga?
and these are still little things compared to the enormous big hole in the plot related to its 'prophetic' powers. namely, that it could play a plot, as it is the writer intended, it is essential that our grandmother-teller sees the fate of each of all kinds which it neither relative nor help me, but because for decades can not see who killed her was born a daughter, almost on the doorstep of the house or in the first neighborhood.
darko provides justification in the novel is so pathetic that it is not worth quoting - is reduced to 'so it is', 'mysterious way supernatural', 'now you see it, now you do not see' ... and so some Ćiribu-pocus.

really poor šanerski TRICK, because - all this would have happened to the grandmother-teller immediately saw what she was in his face.
worse: instead of her soul nesmirena Ceri point Kevi, this ghastly fufica waiting for almost two decades before it starts to show - a kind of 14-year bezveznjak! but worst of all - even to swallow this kind of cheating with a 'can now - now I can' supernatural, there is a hole related to the Gypsy is simply inexcusable (sic)! namely, vračarkina Cera was the whore. Gypsy, who is described as a depth psychologist who reads people as a book (and this is a well-read, so you can have them read, is) - missed is that she Cera behind kara for money. and not only then, for life. it is nothing about that guess even decades later. and therefore the end of the novel we have:
"Mother did not know what her daughter is engaged and the police had a passion to convince the facts."
(p. 258)
that, yes, that he broke a cookie when you soak it in milk darko sunken like dinosaur ...
b) the villain in this quasi-horror novel uncle GOSA.


that GOSA's uncle became a shape-shifter? nice: smorila it ALL TA RAVNICA, he became bored to fucking a black horse, and began to wander the world. having visited all the continents, the footsteps fawn Gutovic, settled down in Hawaii with a local beauty (according to the wish-fulfillment shoddy fantasies) but - in one vulanske activities it something a little oprljila štrcnuta lion. as is well known, the man who burnt volcanic lava - it becomes shape-shifter. why?
why. 'so it is'. ie: 'Strange are the ways supernatural'.
or, as I said krisvel in PLAN 9 FROM OUTER SPACE: "can you prove that it did not happen? "
however, a hole not only in how it became a monster-Gosa Gosa - holes and everything else related to it: how that šejp-sifting, how and why, what all insufficient compliance.
hole is in the fact that GOSA has become the villain even before the eruption, because the Gipsy girl-because that will pay the Finally - sjebo much
ago and fiery adventure, that is, if we are right, the novel ultimately unnecessary. his desire to take place baticino apparent even without that distorted and unconvincing embodied metaphors about changing the character.
c) lame, unconvincing supernatural conception
relaxed
anything goes attitude towards the supernatural, but is obvious from the above examples, related to the 'discerning' Gypsy woman who can not see what is most directly concerned, and Uncle Goša when the volcano becomes a šejp-sifter, just because .

also was treated and a key symbol of the novel - silkworm with sheath.

namely, nevidovita gypsy pier by 'bebica' of the silkworm, a mambo-jumbo explanation of how it works, literally reads:
"Silk is the thread that connects the worlds and keeps the connection with what has long since disappeared. Bebice know which steps may be going and will push us along." (127)
nonsense. anything stupid I almost read a book.
poor attempt to be some kind of third-class pathos Potur neprobirljivom readers as not-know-what symbol not-know-what. irrelevant, it is important that 'sounds good'. silk, baby, transformations, tandara-Mandara-madder - fill in the blanks!
d) the sex lives of teenagers Pancevo
this remark taken from the fence: I am a man of peasant, from the south, and I may be wrong Applying the standards applicable in the niche for a way of life in Pancevo, which, for all I know, you really look like the Darko's novel.

elem, our 14-year-old romeo is not even 'go' with the girl, and he's already ready to pair off and sits on - as it turns out - mlitavog Đoša. says the 14-year-old željka (radodajka): 'with you I want to go to the end! It is you! " of consumption Đoša or removing visitor can not be anything just because it is the future osmake not get it up when need be, but no matter, the young, will be the day.

until that day comes - željka comes to dialogue, sleep with him before his parents, his dad finds them sleeping under a blanket (p. 64), and later the chief procurer dad to lose his sinak darkness before she gets in the eighth grade
. before the end of the novel, while leaving the sink at home while waiting for this woman, that is. Zeljko: "My father winked:" Well, he will manage and Zeljko somehow. '" (p. 206) ;
now, I can not understand that today's youth in the sex comes in elementary school. even and niche. true, so early start mainly those with cheaper tickets: nice kids, good students and even those who have higher ambitions than to be in the public transport drivers and workers in a boutique, though, the full-blown in-out-in-out penetrative sex couple entering godinica later. but what they are doing
touted one thing.
what the heroes of this novel work in front of their parents, as normal for a thing, on vacation between 7 and 8 grade is simply too liberal for any what frames, even Western, let alone Serbian.
but allow: I may be wrong. may be different in Pancevo. there may be some sedmenka not fufetina than odlikašica really comes to her boyfriend while his parents are here and sleep with it under the same blanket as a normal thing in the world. if it is really so - Sorry, I really apologize!
e) arbitrary relationships between the characters, flimsy motivation and characterization
- women around which the two brothers zakrviše - grow into a banal housekeeper, malograđanku as such by even born son described (see descriptions of her home before coming to save uncle Goša; dumb lunches during which forks sound like an organ, and in general its attachment to the kitchen during vascelog novel);
;
- di is obsessed uncle who had never seen, moreover, the uncle of rare postcards refers to it only as a 'child' and only a few weeks before coming to remember to ask whether a general or nephew niece! but no matter, di adores him sight unseen, imagined themselves as Eskimos who cut the ice below ujakovih story, etc. etc.. - And then, at the first hint that there is some kind of shadow in his uncle - and immediately reverses ćurak no doubt begin to see a monster in it any one else noticed.
even some of površnijih readers noticed the similarity - not to say anything more - this plot with that of the Hitchcock classic, SHADOW OF DOUBT (you know, beloved uncle comes after a long absence, and his niece - who it is without seeing it on-bo A-to-va-la! - gradually begins to suspect that Uncle may not be as fantastical as it seems). Unfortunately, although the skeleton of the premise of the prescription, in the novel under Darko is nothing left of Hitchcockian tension and uncertainty about whether the uncle is or is not ... darkom with no uncertainty, because we immediately he describes some sort of supernatural andrmolja-shadow, which meanders around Čiče, so that everything hičovo thrown out the window, and immediately we start with special effects.
- dijev best friend, Martin, good as a sidekick in the opening chapters, as Buck-errand boy by one of our teen-romeo , however, when the writer does not know what to do with him in the later work, on it - literally! - Išutira the novel! our most excellent of his own second literally kick in the ass tak ode to the fall in the river and cuts his head: and why? that's so. without much reason. Martin exit, until the end when a moment. - Zeljko, dijeva girl, after the events in the novel, suddenly no longer his little girl. since neither nor di darko do not know what to do with it, followed by separation, just because. apparently, they went together I do not know what Calvary
(coming soon to this blog, btw!) and after all that, can no longer be together. 'Divide my little, we do not se dalo, da zajedno gradimo svoj dom – da i od tebe napravim dosadnu domaćicu poput moje keve....'
           
što je još smešnije,
sena naše željke posle lady di-a padne na – ĆUZU, levo smetalo iz offa, pomenuto 3-4 puta na početku kao bezveznjaka koga samo zanima da peca ribe. i tako željka završi s tim smušenjakom. a delovala je tako fino, iako se rano bacila u neprikrivene sexualne eskapade: ko bi reko da će da završi s onim šmokljanom? no, ko zna: možda on nema problems with impotence as our (a) di.
f) unintentional self-scored
on several occasions even the author seems to, in a muddy semiconsciousness, looming like trash prints, and admits:
-
His uncle's face while telling on its second life, so distant and unreal as it is copied from a book
. "(151)
in truth, the episode with the uncles 'adventures' in the land of fantasy, really act as transcribed from a book (or, more likely to be, comics) : unconvincing, fejkerske, false and even ridiculous - especially when their stripizovana 'exotic' is inserted in the middle of a fairly realistically described Pancevo. ;
- "In short, we looked like father and son from a romantic television series, only we, instead of baseball bat, handled an ax. "(240)
Indeed, it is. my mother was 'characterized'
kitchen and dad - splitting wood . man simply has a fetish for splitting wood in the middle of summer Share online who are unhealthy, and even with the Syncom bonduje precisely through that (male, was I) activity, just as the writer saw in foreign series do Calci and sons playing baseball.

occasion dad even show his offspring
secret handshake with an ax: how splitting wood as a special, unique and unprecedented (and in fact extremely simple, you will know anyone who has ever really splitting wood) that in the end just to him our di to realize that his dad is dad, but his character - just like the HELLRAISER, another obvious model - over dude.
--- continue: the end of the next issue! ---

0 comments:

Post a Comment